Dyslexi A Specific Neurological Learning Disability

Dyslexia Definition The Texas Education Code defines Dyslexia to mean a disorder of constitutional origin manifested by a difficulty in learning to read, write, or spell, despite conventional instruction, adequate intelligence, and sociocultural opportunity. â€Å"Related disorders† include disorders similar to or related to dyslexia such as developmental auditory imperceptions, dysphasia, specific developmental dyslexia, developmental dysphasia, and developmental spelling disability (Texas Education Agency, 2014). However, the International Dyslexia Association adds that: Dyslexia is a specific neurological learning disability that is characterized by difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word recognition and by poor spelling and decoding†¦show more content†¦Furthermore, students with dyslexia have trouble with understanding and hearing how sounds make up words in the spoken language, phonological memory and automaticity. Consequently, problems with these rudimentary processes result in subsequent issues with reading comprehension and written expression (Keller ISD, 2008). The TEA Dyslexia Handbook outlines the characteristics of dyslexia by grade level: Preschool students experience delays in learning to speak, difficulty with rhyming, pronouncing words and adding new vocabulary words, poor auditory memory, inability to recall the right word, trouble remembering letters and numbers, and a dislike for print or reading. Kindergarten and First grade students face difficulty with syllables, identifying and manipulating sounds in words, decoding, spelling words the way they sound and/or remembering letter sequences in sight words. In addition to many of the problems that preschool- first grade students endure, second and third grade students experience also experience difficulty recalling letter patterns in reading, connecting speech sounds with appropriate letter or letter combinations, decoding unfamiliar words and written expression, and they heavily rely on picture clues, or guess at words while reading. Fourth through sixth grade students exhibit the same behaviors

Mythology Tales Of Gods And Heroes - 1672 Words

Mythology: Tales of Gods and Heroes Glossary: Important Gods (1) Zeus, also known as Jupiter. Brother to Poseidon and Hades. He is the supreme leader of the Gods and he is the Lord of the Sky, the Rain-God, and the cloud gatherer, who wielded the incredible Thunderbolt. His power alone was greater than that of all the divinities combined. He once told his family â€Å"I am mightiest of all. Make trial that you may know. Fasten a rope of gold to heaven and lay hold, every God, and Goddess. You could not drag down Zeus. But if I wished to drag you down, then I would. The rope I would bind to a pinnacle of Olympus and all would hang in the air, yes, the very earth and the sea too.† (2) Poseidon, also known as Neptune. Brother to Zeus and†¦show more content†¦Each city had a public hearth sacred to Hestia, where the fire was never allowed to burn out. If a colony was to be found, the colonists carried with them coals from the heart of the mother city. (5) Hera or as the Romans knew her Juno. Hera was wife and sister to Zeus. It was a completely different time. Anyways, she was raised by Titans Ocean and Tethys. She was a protector of marriage. There is said to be the little attraction in her portraits drawn of her. In an early poem, she is called â€Å"Golden Throned Hera, among immortals the queen Chief among them in beauty, the glorious lady All the blessed in high Olympus revere, Honor even as Zeus, the lord of the thunder.† But on every account of her that gets on detail, it presents that she punished many of the women Zeus fell in love with. Even when the women were tricked, this made absolutely no difference to Hera. Not only did the women suffer but also their children. (6) Ares referred to by the Romans to be Mars. The God of War. Ares is the son of Zeus and Hera. He is hateful throughout the Iliad poem. Occasionally heroes rejoice in Areas’ victories. However the other times Ares is escaping the brutality of the gods. Homer calls him â€Å"Murderous, bloodstained, the incarnate curse of mortals† And oddly enough he even calls him a coward. A coward in which, bellows with pain, and flees when wounded. In battle, he has a series of companions on the battlefield. His sisterShow MoreRelatedGreek Mythology : Ancient Mythology1630 Words   |  7 PagesGreek mythology denotes to the myths of the early Greeks, Greece gods, and mythical creatures. While pertaining to these legends and myths i ncludes; to their Gods, the nature and heroes, tales of clashes, and of their adventures. It is also a brief on the origin and connotation of their cult, and the innumerable practices that remained shadowed by them. Myth is defined as; a traditional, typically historic story pertaining to mystic beings, descendants, or heroes that serve an essential kind in theRead MoreEssay about Exposition of Mythology846 Words   |  4 PagesExposition of Mythology Since the beginning of time people have found great interest in the study of mythology and its origin. For the past five weeks I have been studying this deep and complex issue and have come to the conclusion that without myths history would not be the same. In this paper I will discuss what myths are and how scholars have broken them down. Scholars such as Joseph Campbell go into great detail to explain mythology and how it effects the human life. First you must determineRead MoreGreek Mythology And The Mythology1154 Words   |  5 Pagesand lessons of Greek mythology have shaped art and literature for thousands of years. Later Greek writers and artists used and elaborated upon these sources in their own work. Did you know that in ancient Greece, stories about gods and goddesses and heroes and monsters were an important part of everyday life. They explained everything from rituals to the weather, and they gave meaning to the world people saw around them. Many consumer products get their names from Greek mythology. For example sportsRead MoreSignificance And Significance Of Mythology1743 Words   |  7 PagesIn order to understand the importance and meaning of magic in mythology, it is helpful to try to understand why human cultures create myths. Mythology can refer to the collected myths of a group of people—their body of stories which they tell to explain nature, history, and customs—or to the study of such m yths. As a collection of such stories, mythology is a vital feature of every culture. Various origins for myths have been proposed, ranging from personification of nature, personification of naturalRead MoreThe Importance of Greek Mythology1650 Words   |  7 Pagesimportance of Greek mythology Today, the ancient Greek myths still fascinate readers throughout the world. There are thousands of books written about the importance of Greek mythology in the formation of modern-time societies. There are hundreds of movies created about the adventures of Greek heroes. Apparently, the events, creatures, and people described in the ancient Greek myths were not real; however, their mythical nature does not undermine the importance of Greek mythology in defining the worldRead MoreMythology and How It Affects Society Essay1218 Words   |  5 PagesMythology has been used in a multitude of ways since the beginnings of civilization as it provided mankind explanation for natural occurrences: harvest time and the changing of the seasons, natural disasters: earthquakes and storms, and life events: birth and death, but was also used to simply provide entertainment. Another huge role that mythology played a part in was the explanation of how the earth and all its people were created and why . This formed the structure for many societies as they couldRead MoreGreek Mythology And The Mythology850 Words   |  4 Pagesbelieve in a multitude of gods and creatures, and they have gods for fertility, elements, war, medicine, and a multitude of others. The mythology of these two cultures is exceedingly similar, although for those looking for a more interesting view on the subject, Greek mythology is far superior to Roman mythology. The time period in which mythological tales were told began over one hundred years ago in 19 BC for the Romans through the epic Aeneid; however, Greek mythology has existed longer. ThereRead MoreGreek Mythology Vs Roman Mythology1256 Words   |  6 Pages Greek vs. Roman Mythology The line separating Greek and Roman mythology may seem very fine, but there are actually a few distinct differences between the two. For example, the Greeks and Romans both presented many of their stories orally, however, the Greeks were the first people to begin writing them down. Greek mythology is superior as it puts more emphasis on the role of mortals, the appearance of gods is more relevant, and its origin is more interesting as it was original and came before theRead MoreNative American Folklore As Mythology Essay1066 Words   |  5 PagesThroughout history, and all over the world, mythology has been developed as a way of explaining the unknown and coping with one’s existence. Why does the sun shine? Well, seemingly, to generations past, something is controlling the universe, so there must be a god in charge of the sun and many other natural phenomenon. During the creation of Native American myths, â€Å"there was much in the way of free-range food, but hunting wasnt as easy as getting up in the morning, taking a stroll and shooting aRead MoreMythology In Fan Mythology742 Words   |  3 Pagesthe world myth we think of ancient Greek and Roman stories that tell us tales of gods, heroes, and monsters; in the modern world it is also used to butter up advertisements, and of course in fan fiction. When you look at the concept of myth it has been important to the practice and analysis of fan work, including fan fiction, on three levels: content, form, and theory. In terms of content, traditional tales including mythologies provide us with characters, narratives, monsters, and story worlds for

Employee Selection Process in Private Company Free Essays

string(43) " referenced as technical guides by judges\." EMPLOYEE SELECTION FOR SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS: THE INFLUENCES OF THE UNIFORM GUIDELINES AND COURT DECISIONS Edward, Ph. D. McKendree College Business Division 701 College Road Lebanon, IL 62254 (618)-537-4481 ABSTRACT The Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978) were promulgated with large businesses in mind in order to affect large numbers of employees as rapidly as possible. We will write a custom essay sample on Employee Selection Process in Private Company or any similar topic only for you Order Now However, the employee selection validation procedure advocated by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, criterion related validity, is one that small business owners are unable to use due to statistical restraints and the lack of personnel with the esoteric knowledge of validation procedures. These restrictions, coupled with court decisions such as Albemarle Paper Company v. Moody in which the United States Supreme Court ruled the test validation guidelines issued by the EEOC were to be given â€Å"great deference† by lower courts, have left small business owners with one practical and potentially legally defensible approach to employee selection. This paper briefly mentions the advantages of valid employee selection procedures, followed by a detailed description of the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978), relevant court cases, and a case study describing the validation of a small business employee selection test by the author. INTRODUCTION The importance of small business to the U. S. economy was well summarized by Siropolis (1986), who wrote: †¦ more than 99 percent of the nation’s 16 million businesses are small-even if we define a small business as one that employs fewer than 100 rather than 500 †¦. Further evidence of its vitality is the fact that small business employs roughly half of the nation’s workforce (pg. 8). In addition, Siropolis (1986) listed numerous other reasons for the importance of small business to the U. S. conomy, such as the higher return on equity small manufacturers earn than large manufacturers, the innovation found in small businesses as evidenced by small businesses accounting for half of all major inventions in the last 30 years in the U. S. , and the dependence of large businesses on small businesses as both suppliers and purchasers. These economic facts indicate that small business in the U. S. is the paramount force for economic growth and the creati on of jobs, as noted recently: Small businesses are the principal job creating sector of the economy during recessions and expansions† (â€Å"The State Of†, 1985, pg. 46). Further evidence of the economic importance of small business has recently been published: Employment gains in small-business dominated industries in construction (18. 9 percent), finance, insurance and real estate (12. 7 percent), and services (12. 6 percent) are impressive when compared to the gains made in similar, large business dominated industries. In construction, the small business ted industries had employment gains of 18. 9 percent, while the large business industries showed an employment loss of 10. percent. The relative strengths of the small business gains in wholesale and retail trade are also significant †¦. Small firms with fewer than 100 employees†¦ generated 52. 6 percent of net employment growth from 1976 to 1982. (â€Å"The State Of†, 1985, p. 17-21). One can add t o this the reliance of the U. S. government on small businesses, as evidenced by the federal government purchasing almost 29% of its of goods and services from small businesses in 1983 (â€Å"The State Of†, 1985). EMPLOYEE SELECTION An area of vital importance within small business management is the area of employee selection. An increasing awareness of the importance of employee selection has been noted: â€Å"Nearly 40% of surveyed employers are using more prehiring testing of job candidates than they were five years ago† (â€Å"Prehiring Tests†, 1986, p. 17). The importance to the U. S. economy of employee selection in a small business is due both to the fact that small businesses create the majority of new jobs in the U. S. (Birch, 1979; â€Å"The State Of†, 1985), and the impact of the employee selection process on a small business. First, the results of a valid selection procedure include increased productivity of as much as 20 percent (Schmidt, Hunter, McKenzie, Muldrow, 1979). This is an important result to small business owners, as productivity improvement has been rated as the number one concern of both CEOs and executives and engineers in separate surveys (â€Å"Productivity: A Top†, 1986, p. 46). Other important results include an avoidance of lawsuits (Dreher Sackett, 1981; Kleiman Faley, 1978), greater job satisfaction and organizational commitment, reduced absenteeism and fewer disciplinary actions (Fear Ross, 1983), reduced time spent in supervision for the small business owner, and reduced training costs and turnover (Stone Ruch, 1974). The potential for reduced turnover is also important for small business owners, due to recent data indicating that: Small businesses have higher annual employee turnover than large companies. The Administrative Management Society reports that businesses with 26-250 employees have a 19% turnover rate, while larger firms (more than 5000 employees) average only 7% (â€Å"Small Businesses, Turnover† 1986, p. 13). In total, these results are particularly important due to the greater relative effect each employee has in a small business as opposed to the effect of an individual employee in a large business. In the U. S. , the employee selection procedures used by all business owners are regulated by the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978). The Uniform Guidelines (UG) were designed to provide technical assistance to employers and were written following a review of relevant court cases and consultations with industrial psychologists. At present, the UG are serving as a reference for determining the legality of currently used selection tests. The UG are administered by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which is empowered to do so by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As Landy and Trumbo (1980) have noted: â€Å"The EEOC has evolved from a weak public advocate status to a strong and active enforcement agency, with broad powers to initiate and negotiate legal and administrative action on behalf of protected minority groups† (p. 92). Although the UG are not â€Å"law† as a lawyer would define law in that they were not passed as bills in Congress, they are frequently referenced as technical guides by judges. You read "Employee Selection Process in Private Company" in category "Essay examples" In the UG, the employment decisions made by business owners and managers are regulated and broadly defined, e. . , promotions, referrals for training, as well as selection for hiring are all subject to the influence of the UG. The UG list three allowable approaches to validating a selection test used by a business. Briefly, criterion related validation approaches focus on the statistical ability of the selection test to predict the criterion, or as noted by Dreher and Sackett (1981): â€Å"†¦ criterion-related approaches focus on the relationship between a hiring requirement and job behavior† (p. 552). Another way of describing criterion-related validity was written by Landy and Trumbo) (1980): â€Å"When we are investigating the validity of a selection procedure using a criterion related design, typically, we are looking for a significant correlation between a test (predictor) and job behavior (criterion)† (p. 70- 71). The UG define criterion related validity in this way: â€Å"In criterion related validity, a selection procedure is justified by a statistical relationship between scores on the test or other selection procedure and measures of job performance† (P. 8292, Federal Register, 1978). According to the UG, the requirements of the job analysis, which is a comprehensive definition of the tasks performed by a job incumbent, are: â€Å"There should be a review of job information to determine measures of work behavior(s) or performance that are relevant to the job or group of jobs in question†. The paramount difficulty with conducting a criterion related va lidity study for the small business owner is the required number of hirees, which is discussed in the UG under the term of â€Å"technical feasibility†. Although the minimum is not specified in the UG, an absolute minimum is 30 employees (Heneman, Schwab, Fossum, Dyer, 1986). For many small business owners, this minimum number is more employees than they hire in a year, which in turn makes the criterion related validation approach of little value. In addition, the statistical measures required by the criterion related validity approach are often recondite for a small business owner. Construct valuation approaches attempt to measure an applicant’s amount of psychological characteristics such as â€Å"need for achievement†. The UG discuss construct validity in this manner: â€Å"Construct validity involves identifying the psychological trait (the construct) which underlies successful performance on the job and then devising a selection procedure to measure the presence and degree of that construct† (p. 38292, Federal Register, 1978). The construct validity of a test refers to the extent to which it measures the construct it is supposed to measure. Landy and Trumbo (1980) noted: â€Å"It is the most theoretical of the definitions of validity, since it is concerned with the abstractions used in referring to psychological structures, functions, or traits, rather than to the prediction of some external criterion† (p. 73). The job analysis for a construct validity study involves a list of critical job behaviors and the constructs believed to underly the behaviors. These studies are difficult to do, as a â€Å"construct† is a hypothetical attribute of a person that underlies and guides their behavior. Content validation approaches are oncerned with the job relatedness of the selection test rather than a concern with the criterion. Landy and Trumbo (1980) defined this approach toe employee selection procedure validation as: â€Å"Content validity is concerned with the extent to which the sample of items in a test (and the sample behavior elicited by these items) is an unbiased representation of the domain (i. e. , attr ibute or trait) being sampled† (p. 71). According to the UG: â€Å"A selection procedure can be supported by a content validity strategy to the extent that it is a representative sample of the content of the job†. An important concept for a content valid selection procedure is the job analysis, which was defined by Schultz (1978): â€Å"The purpose of the job analysis is to describe, in specific term, the precise nature of the component tasks performed by the workers on a particular job† (p. 76). A job analysis can be approached in a variety of ways, as noted by McCormick and Tiffin (1974): â€Å"Job analysis can be considered as embracing the collection and analysis of any type of job related information, by any method, for any purpose† (p. 9). The job analysis for a content validity study involves interviewing and observing incumbents: Job analysis for content validity. There should be a job analysis which includes an analysis of the important work behaviors(s) required for successful performance and their relative importance and, if the behavior results in work product(s), an analysis of the work product(s). Any job analysis should focus on the work behaviors and the tasks ass ociated with them †¦ The work behaviors selected for measurement should be critical work behaviors and/or important work behaviors constituting most of the job. The key to content validity is the answers to the questions the small business owner must ask: â€Å"How representative of on the job behaviors is the test? Does it sample all important aspects of the job? † Landy and Trumbo (1980) wrote â€Å"Content validity is determined on the basis of how well the test material samples the job performance domain† (p. 72). The validity of a content validation study is judgmental; no statistical analysis is done (Robinson, 1981). The value of the content validation approach to a small business owner is that it allows a selection test to be validated within the UG restraints, and at the same time it does not require large sample sizes or recondite statistical analyses: When is content validation appropriate? One circumstance is when there are too few people available to form a sample for purposes of empirical validation. While there are differences of opinion on what the minimum necessary sample size is for empirical validation, an absolute minimum is 30 individuals who all perform the same job (Heneman et al. 986, pg. 281-283). The restrictions of the content validity approach are few. One of the restrictions is that the selection test should consist only of knowledge or skills that cannot readily be learned on the job (Miner Miner, 1980). In addition, content validity is prohibited by the UG to measure mental processes as part of a selection procedure. An example of the content validation approach to employ ee selection is the appropriately titled Content Oriented Personnel Selection in a Small Business Setting by Robinson (1981). In his article, which involved the content validation process needed in designing a selection procedure which was used to hire one construction superintendent for a small construction firm, Robinson (1981) informs the reader of the steps necessary in a job analysis for a content valid selection test: 1. Convene a panel of experts†¦. 2. Ask the panel to identify all the broad objectives to be met by an ideal incumbent on the target job. If objectives can be so quantified that they can properly be called standards, so much the better†¦. 3. List specific behaviors required to meet each objective †¦. 4. Identification of â€Å"critical† tasks †¦ The content sample will be valid to the extent that the critical tasks reflect actual job performance †¦. 5. Determination of interjudge agreement as to the importance of major dimensions of the job†¦ (pgs. 78-79). The importance of such a systematic approach to the job analysis was emphasized by Dreher and Sackett (1981): â€Å"The quality of any content validation effort depends on the thoroughness and appropriateness of the job analysis† (p. 54); the job analysis will be used to determine if the content valid test actually samples relevant job behavior mentioned in the job analysis as important. Having conducted the job analysis, Robinson (1981) constructed a test battery based upon work sample procedures. As an example, the applicants were given a construction error recognition test in which the applicants were required to inspect a 8†² by 12†² shed that contained 25 construction errors. The applicants were to list the construction errors they spotted during their inspection. This emphasis on the UG when discussing employee selection approaches for small business owners stems from two major court cases which directly ruled on the use of content validity as a way of validating a selection instrument. In Firefighters Institute for Racial Equality v. City of St. Louis, a promotional examination for fire captains was ruled to have adequate content validity within the directives of the UG. In U. S. v. Connelie, a selection procedure for New York State Police was ruled to be invalid due to in large part the lack of a task-oriented job analysis nor was the frequency and importance of job duties identified. In both of these cases, the UG used in making the judicial rulings. Two other court cases which indicate the importance of understating content validity are Harless v. Duck and King v. New Hampshire Department of Resources and Economic Development. In Harless v. Duck, a structured oral interview was found to be rejecting more female applicants than male applicants, however, the employer argued the interview had content validity in that hypothetical situations were used that a police officer might actually face. The court ruled the selection interview was valid, in large part due to its content validity. In King v. New Hampshire, a business lost a discrimination lawsuit due to applicants being asked questions which were not job related, i. e. , not based on a job analysis and therefore not content valid. With the importance of employee selection validation in mind, coupled with the feasibility of the content validation approach for small business owners, I would like to describe the approach I used for a small business owner located in the Midwest. The small business is a general purpose real estate office (â€Å"general purpose,† in the sense that it handled farm, commercial, and private dwelling real estate sales) which has two owner managers and 10 sales associates. The primary function of the sales force for this small business is to sell as much real estate as possible, in terms of monetary value rather than number of units sold. The organization did not have a job analysis of the job of real estate agent and was using an unstructured interview to hire applicants. The initial step was to develop a job analysis. The purposes of the job analysis were to (a) define the job duties being performed by the job incumbents, (b) obtain a listing of the requisite knowledge, skills, and abilities to perform each job duty, and (c) determine the importance and time spent on each job duty as perceived by the incumbents. For this small business, the process of collecting information for the job analysis consisted of three steps: (a) reviewing the appropriate entry in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, (b) reading the job related material from the firm’s files, and (c) a series of interviews with all 10 real estate agents and both of the owner-managers. Due to the job analyst’s lack of familiarity with the job, the first step was to review the job description in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. Its value is noted by Bass and Barrett (1981): â€Å"The job analyst can turn to the Dictionary of Occupational Titles to get a concise definition of almost any job in American industry† (p. 238). The use of this volume when approaching a job one is not familiar with was also noted by Cascio (1978): â€Å"First, the reader can become familiar with the vast array of jobs in general and with appropriate terminology in each job, (p. 47). The second step also involved acquiring some job related information about being a real estate agent; this step consisted of a reading of the informational and training manuals that are made available to the real estate agents. The perusal of these manuals was valuable in giving the job analyst background information necessary to conduct the third step of the information collection, the inte rviews with job incumbents. These interviews were conducted in a private room and ranged from 30 to 90 minutes. The interviews followed a patterned interview form, as recommended by Cascio (1978). The interview questions asked for traits, behaviors, and knowledge that the incumbents deemed necessary for the completion of the job of real estate agent. The interviewees were also informed that any knowledge or behaviors an applicant could learn within eight hours was not to be included. An example of an interview question is â€Å"What is the order of behaviors from the time you contact a customer until you are through with a sale? † The interviews generated a list of 106 job duties. Each of the interviewees received a copy of the 106 job duties, along with an instruction sheet asking them to rate each item as to its importance to their job and the relative amount of time they spend performing that job duty. The mean rating given each of the 106 job duties was computed by the job analyst for both the rating dimensions. With the interview information and summary statistics on hand, a selection instrument was constructed which was based on job duties which were rated highly in terms of their importance and time spent on each of them by job ncumbents, and which job incumbents considered were not trainable within eight hours. The selection instrument was based on a job sample approach, which is valid for a content validity based selection instrument. As an example, the selection instrument asked an applicant to calculate monthly payments on a home given certain financial parameters. The questions were given to six randomly selected job incumbents who were asked to ch oose which of the job sample test questions an applicant would have to pass in order to meet minimum standards as a new employee. The job incumbents overall picked an average of 80% of the job sample items as being necessary for a new employee to pass to be acceptable at a minimum level of acceptability. Therefore, an applicant would have to score a minimum of 80% in order to be considered for employment. As a check on the validity of the 80% cutoff score, the job sample questions were given to the four other job incumbents. All of these incumbents were considered to be satisfactory employees by the business owners, and all received a passing score of over 80%. In summary, small business owners need to be aware of the UG, the court cases which have resulted from the UG, the one practical approach to validating a selection procedure, and the advantages to having a validated selection procedure. By following the outline of Robinson (1981) or the case presented in this paper, the small business owner can both enjoy the benefits of a validated selection procedure and lessen any worry over an EEOC lawsuit. REFERENCES Bass, B. M. , Barrett, G. V. (1981). People, work, and organizations. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Birch, D. L. (1979). The job generation process. M. I. T. Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Cascio, W. F. (1978). Applied psychology in personnel management. Reston, Virginia: Reston Publishing Company, Inc. Dreher, G. F. , Sackett, P. R. (1981). Some problem with applying content validity evidence to assessment center procedures. Academy of Management Review, 6, p. 551-560. Fear, R. A. , Ross, J. F. (1983). Jobs, Dollars, and EEO: How to Hire More Productive Entry- Level Workers. New York, McGraw-Hill. Harless v. Duck, 14 FEB 1616 (1977). Heneman , H. G. , Schwab, D. P. , Fossum, J. A. , Dyer, L. D. (1986). Personnel/Human Resource Management. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin. King v. New Hampshire Department of Resources and Economic Development, 15, FEB 669 (1977) Kleiman, L. S. , Faley, R. H. (1978). Assessing content validity: Standards set by the court. Personnel Psychology, 30, 701-713. Landy, F. J. , Trumbo, D. A. (1980). Psychology of Work Behavior. The Dorsey Press, Homewood, Illinois. McCormick, E. J. , Tiffin, B. L. (1974). Jobs and their requirements. Industrial Psychology, (6th ed. ). Miner, M. G. Miner, J. B. (1980). Uniform Guidelines on employee selection Procedures. Washington, D. C. , The Bureau of National Affairs. Prehiring Tests. (1986, June). Small Business Report. Business Research and Communications, Monterey, California. Productivity: A Top Concern. (1986, February). Small Business Report, Business Research and Communications, Monterey, California. Robinson, D. D. (1981). Content-oriented personnel selection in a small business setting. Personnel Psychology, 34, pgs. 77-87. Schmidt, F. L. , Hunter, J. E. , McKenzie, R. C. , and Muldrow, T. W. (1979). Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 609-626. Schultz, D. P. (1978). Psychology and industry today. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Siropolis, N. C. (1986). Small Business Management. Houghton Mifflin Company, Geneva, Illinois. Small Businesses’ Turnover High. (1986, January). Small Business Report, Business Research and Communications, Monterey, California. Stone, C. H. , Ruch, F. L. (1974). Selection, interviewing, and testing. ASPA Handbook of Personnel and Industrial Relations: Staffing Policies and Strategies, ed. Dale Yoder and Herbert G. Heneman (Washington, D. C. , The Bureau of National Affairs), 4, 137-138. The State of Small Business: A Report of the President. (1985, May). United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures (1978). Federal Register, 43, 38290- 38309. How to cite Employee Selection Process in Private Company, Essay examples

Tax Rate Biases in Tax Planning Decisions

Question: Discuss about the Tax Rate Biases in Tax Planning Decisions. Answer: Introduction The following case is based on the contract of sale entered by the taxpayer on January 10 2002, for the purpose of land sale valued $2,975,000. The contract was formed as per the Option Agreement between the parties along with the option fee amounted to $25,000 to be borne by the purchaser as soon as the contract is executed. According to the clause 2 of the contract, it was stated that the option would be exercised by providing written notice including the payment of contract deposit amount. Another clause of the contract i.e. clause 5 stated that on receiving the written notice and requisite payment, the seller would be liable to sell the land while the purchaser would be liable to buy the same. According to the terms and conditions of the contract, buyer paid the deposit amount but failed to pay the balance amount $2,677,500 on the extended settlement date July 10 2003. Due to the failure in payment, taxpayer served a rescission notice on buyer to fulfill the default amount, which was not complied on 11 July 2003. Accordingly, the taxpayer rescinded the contract on sale on land while the amount of deposit was forfeited on 26 July 2003. Issue: Accordingly, the case was proceeded to the commissioner and assessed the seller for payment of GST with respect to the forfeited amount. The Commissioner contended that the forfeited amount was deposited within the meaning of taxable supply under section 9-5 GST Act (Goods and Service Tax Act) 1999. The Federal Court of Australia contended that the taxpayer forfeited the deposit amounted was subjected to receipt of consideration for the supply on rescission of the contract. Law/ Regulations breached Law: Considering the regulations of GST Act 1999 section 9-5, it is stated that the taxable supply would be regarded as supply for consideration if the payment of such supply does not meet the other present relevant criteria. Further, section 9-10(1) provides the meaning of supply that includes grant, assignment or sale of real property against the consideration (Wilkinson?Ryan and Hoffman 2015). In addition, it has been stated that under section 29-5 GST Act 1999, taxable supply is subjected to the charge of GST for the period of tax during which the amount of consideration has been received in terms of the issued invoice (Odening, Ritter and Httel 2015). The Act of GST 1999 also states the regulations on security deposit under section 99-5 providing that the amount of security deposit cannot be referred as an amount of consideration. However, it would be considered as consideration only if the amount of security deposit is forfeited by the seller due to failure of performance as per the contract obligation (Kowalski 2015). The amount of deposit will be included as a part of consideration if such amount is accounted in the form of consideration. Therefore, the amount of deposit with respect to taxable supply is subjected to the charge of GST since the security deposit was a part of consideration for the performance as per the contract (Moore 2016). Breach of Law: In view of the facts of the case, it has been noted that the payment of contract amount for sale of land had been categorized as deposit amount and the balance amount of settlement date. As the buyer failed to pay the balance amount of consideration as on the extended date of the contract therefore, the taxpayer forfeited the balance amount and failed to consider the amount as a taxable supply for the payment of GST. It can be said that the taxpayer breached the regulation of GST Act 1999 section 99-5 on constituting the forfeited amount as consideration. Since the principle under section, 99-5 provides that the security deposit amount is regarded as consideration if such amount has been forfeited due to failure of performance (May 2016). Since the amount of security deposit $297,500 forfeited by the taxpayer, it is said that the requirement of section 99-5 has been breached. Further, taxpayer did not consider section 9-5 of GST 1999 with respect to the meaning of taxa ble supply, which states the inclusion of consideration if the same does not fall in any other criteria (Yung 2016). In both the situations, the deposit amount forfeited by the taxpayer constitutes the part of consideration hence Goods and Service Tax charge would be applicable on the amount of deposit. With respect to the terms of economy, GST is referred as consumption tax since the burden is imposed on the consumers while it is directly chargeable to the receiver of the consideration. Additionally, section 9-10 provides that the word supply include real property, which means the right or interest on the land as well as a license to own the land (Behal 2016). Accordingly, in the present case, the contract on sale of land had been created but the taxpayer has not provided the invoice to the purchaser. Further, mere presentation of contract does not constitute or transfer the right to use or occupy the land since the full consideration had not been paid to the seller. Analysis of courts decision In view of the principles of GST Act, the Australian court held that the contract between the taxpayer and purchaser for sale of land i.e. for the supply of real property. However, the supply of property could not be considered since the contract was rescinded. On the contrary, the taxpayer forfeited the amount of security deposited and as per the rules of section 99-5 of GST Act 1999 forfeiture of deposit is considered as consideration. Accordingly, taxpayer is liable to pay GST charges on the deposit amount $297,500 @ 10% i.e. $29,750. According to the section 9-70 under GST Act, GST is chargeable on the amount of taxable supply at the rate 10%, which was breached by the taxpayer since the taxpayer did not charge the amount of GST. Division 29 under the GST Act states the regulations on charges for a tax period if the taxpayer receives the consideration and if the respective invoice has been issued for the taxable supply (Smalley 2016). In the present case, the taxpayer or seller did not issue any invoice but the taxpayer had received consideration with respect to the security deposit. Therefore, it can be noted that the taxpayer breached the regulations of division 29 since one criteria has been followed in terms of receipt of consideration. The decision of the court had been taken on the basis of legal requirements of GST Act 1999 on taxable supply. Even though the contract was not complied as the taxpayer rescinded it but the forfeiture of deposit amount would be constituted as consideration, hence the provision of GST Act 1999 would be applicable. The case is similar to the case of Brien v Dwyer (1978) 141 CLR 378 where in the deposit amount was considered as a standalone obligation therefore GST charge was applicable. Another reason for which the court contended application of GST charges is the inclusion of deposit amount as a part of consideration for supply of property. The amount of security deposit was a part of supply consideration as in the case of Carpenter v McGrath (1996) 40 NSWLR in which the taxpayer held for breach of GST principles section 9-70. Conclusion Considering the present case of Reliance Carpet Co. Pty Ltd v FC of T, it can be concluded that rescinding of contract does not exclude the chargeability of Goods and Service Tax on the amount of consideration. As per the principle of section 9-5 GST Act 1999, it was contended that the amount of security deposit would not be considered as amount of consideration. However, if the seller forfeits the amount on failure of contractual performance, then it would be subjected to consideration. In the present case, taxpayer rescinded the contract since the purchaser paid the deposit amount but failed to pay the balance amount on the settlement date. On failure of payment, the taxpayer forfeited the amount of security deposit but did not pay the GST charges and breached the regulations of section 9-5 and division 29 of GST Act 1999. Further, the meaning of supply as per the principles of GST Act 1999 constitutes transfer of real property (Amberger, Eberhartinger and Kasper 2016). Hence, in the given case sale of land would be referred as supply within the meaning of section 9-70, GST Act 1999 whereas the transfer would not be constituted since the obligation of performance was failed. The principle on considering the deposit amount for charges of GST is available only if the receiver forfeits the deposit amount due to failure of contractual performance. In the given case, even though the taxpayer has not provided the invoice for sale of property, amount of security deposit was forfeited. Accordingly, the taxpayer would be liable to pay 10% GST on deposit amount $297,500 as per section 99-5 GST Act 1999. Therefore, it can be concluded that the decision of the court with respect to the charges of GST was correct and reasonable. Reference List Amberger, H., Eberhartinger, E. and Kasper, M., 2016. Tax Rate Biases in Tax Planning Decisions: Experimental Evidence.WU International Taxation Research Paper Series, (2016-29). Bal, A., 2015. Taxing Virtual Currency: Challenges and Solutions.Intertax,43(5), pp.380-394. Behal, V., 2016. IMPACT OF GST ON INDIAN ECONOMY.South Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies,2(4). Bramwell, A.W. and Socash, L., 2015. Preserving Inherited Exclusion Amounts: The New Planning Frontier.Real Property, Trust, and Estate Law Journal,50(1), p.1. Bryant, J.J., 2013. Recovering Taxes Paid When Income Is Forfeited: An Analysis of Section 1341.Journal of Taxation of Investments,30(3). Kowalski, P., 2015. Taxing Bitcoin Transactions Under Polish Tax Law/Opodatkowanie Obrotu Bitcoinami Na Gruncie Przepisw Polskiego Prawa Podatkowego.Comparative Economic Research,18(3), pp.139-152. May, S., 2016. Applying the GST to imported digital products and services: Problems and solutions.Tax Specialist,19(3), p.110. Millar, R. and McCarthy, D., 2012. The Future of Indirect Taxation: Recent Trends in VAT and GST Systems Around the WorldAustralia.THE FUTURE OF INDIRECT TAXATION: RECENT TRENDS IN VAT AND GST SYSTEMS AROUND THE WORLD, T. Ecker, M. Lang, and I. Lejeune, eds., Kluwer Law International: The Netherlands, pp.21-96. Millar, R., 2014. Grappling with basic VAT concepts in the Australian GST: the meaning of supply for consideration.World Journal of VAT/GST Law,3(1), pp.1-31. Moore, M.L., 2016. 16 Tax Implications of the Treatment of Marketing Expenses.Accountable Marketing: Linking Marketing Actions to Financial Performance, p.218. Odening, M., Ritter, M. and Httel, S., 2015. The term structure of land lease rates. In2015 AAEA WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California(No. 201664). Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Western Agricultural Economics Association. Petra, S.T. and Dorata, N.T., 2012. Restricted Stock Awards and Taxes: What Employees and Employers Should Know: Forfeiture Risk, Stock's Potential Future Value Are Key Considerations for Sec. 83 (b) Elections.Journal of Accountancy,213(2), p.44. Smalley, K.E., 2016. Student Note: Section 83 (b) Elections: Taxation and Governance Considerations for Tennessee Start-Up Ventures.Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law,17(2), p.5. Smalley, K.E., 2016. Student Note: Section 83 (b) Elections: Taxation and Governance Considerations for Tennessee Start-Up Ventures.Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law,17(2), p.5. Wilkinson?Ryan, T. and Hoffman, D.A., 2015. The common sense of contract formation.Stanford Law Review,67, pp.14-5. Yung, B., 2016. Justice and taxation: From GST to Hong Kong tax system. InEthical Dilemmas in Public Policy(pp. 183-195). Springer Singapore.